As reported in Monday’s Jakarta Post, Kaing Guek Eav is the only Cambodian from Pol Pot’s killing fields who has confessed to his crimes. This 66 year old, better known as Duch, is on trial for being the former superintendent at the S-21 torture centre. Here they routinely tortured and murdered, inter alia, new-born infants, anyone wearing glasses and soft-handed people. The other co-conspirators still insist that they did nothing but right. Given this anomaly, one should surely enquire why Duch is up until now the only one of this regime to have expressed his guilt and contrition. The answer is quite easily discovered from his comments: He has recently become a Christian. His former colleagues in crime, partners in, arguably, the most violent social experiment in human history, remain atheists.
Atheists would reject the idea that “as a man thinks, so he is”, yet here is living proof that this is all too true. It’s not that atheism qua atheism makes a man necessarily inhumane…it’s just that there really isn’t anything in atheism as such that necessarily makes a man a good one. Chesterton stated this well when he said that when a man disbelieves in God it isn’t that he believes in nothing, but that he will believe anything…including the mass murder of his fellow human beings.
Showing posts with label Social Darwinism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Social Darwinism. Show all posts
Tuesday, February 17, 2009
Friday, February 22, 2008
Carnegie to Zizek
In the Australian Financial Review, in a review of Violence by Slavoj Zizek (Review:5), this quote: "He quotes Elton John to elucidate the conflict between social Darwinism and Christianity."
Now, why would there be a conflict between s-d and Christianity?
Some of the quotes below might give a hint. They are from a recent article on economic oppression.
"Carnegie (the 19th C US steel maker) stated in his autobiography that when he and several of his friends came to doubt the teachings of the Bible,
‘… including the supernatural element, and indeed the whole scheme of salvation through vicarious atonement and all the fabric built upon it, I came fortunately upon Darwin’s and Spencer’s works … . I remember that light came as in a flood and all was clear. Not only had I got rid of theology and the supernatural, but I had found the truth of evolution. “All is well since all grows better” became my [laissez-faire] motto, my true source of comfort. Man was not created with an instinct for his own degradation, but from the lower he had risen to the higher forms. Nor is there any conceivable end to his march to perfection.’ "
Carnegie, A., Autobiography of Andrew Carnegie (1920), edited Van Dyke, J.C., reprint, Northeastern University Press, Boston, p. 327, 1986
Another quote in the same article:
"Historian Gertrude Himmelfarb noted that Darwinism was accepted rapidly in England (but was resisted for decades in France) in part because it justified the greed of the robber barons.
‘The theory of natural selection, it is said, could only have originated in England, because only laissez-faire England provided the atomistic, egotistic mentality necessary to its conception. Only there could Darwin have blandly assumed that the basic unit was the individual, the basic instinct self-interest, and the basic activity struggle. Spengler, describing the Origin as “the application of economics to biology”, said that it reeked of the atmosphere of the English factory … natural selection arose … in England because it was a perfect expression of Victorian “greed-philosophy”, of the capitalist ethic and Manchester economics.’
Milner noted that applying social Darwinism to the capitalism that was common among American businessmen elevated the
‘… traditional virtues of self-reliance, thrift and industry to the level of “natural law”. Based more on the writings of Herbert Spencer than of Charles Darwin, its proponents urged laissez-faire economic policies to weed out the unfit, inefficient and incompetent. "
Not only interesting in its own right, but, Himmelfarb's suggestion that ideas that are taken be some today (for example, the SADists) as being 'scientific' have their founations in the accidents of culture!
So what gospel hope can the SADists bring to a world full of suffering, when the social suffering (about a million a year were affected by industrial accidents in the 19th C in the US) is woven into reality, and not a fall from what was created as truly good? They have melded evil with good and so have no real voice when it comes to standing for the gospel against materialism, because, from the outset, they agree that materialism truly explains the world as it is!
But it doesn't, of course. Materialism's posturing grinds to a halt when confronted by the history of destruction over the earth (the flood) and the mind-boggling complexity of life, for which it provides no explanation (posturing aside, of course).
Now, why would there be a conflict between s-d and Christianity?
Some of the quotes below might give a hint. They are from a recent article on economic oppression.
"Carnegie (the 19th C US steel maker) stated in his autobiography that when he and several of his friends came to doubt the teachings of the Bible,
‘… including the supernatural element, and indeed the whole scheme of salvation through vicarious atonement and all the fabric built upon it, I came fortunately upon Darwin’s and Spencer’s works … . I remember that light came as in a flood and all was clear. Not only had I got rid of theology and the supernatural, but I had found the truth of evolution. “All is well since all grows better” became my [laissez-faire] motto, my true source of comfort. Man was not created with an instinct for his own degradation, but from the lower he had risen to the higher forms. Nor is there any conceivable end to his march to perfection.’ "
Carnegie, A., Autobiography of Andrew Carnegie (1920), edited Van Dyke, J.C., reprint, Northeastern University Press, Boston, p. 327, 1986
Another quote in the same article:
"Historian Gertrude Himmelfarb noted that Darwinism was accepted rapidly in England (but was resisted for decades in France) in part because it justified the greed of the robber barons.
‘The theory of natural selection, it is said, could only have originated in England, because only laissez-faire England provided the atomistic, egotistic mentality necessary to its conception. Only there could Darwin have blandly assumed that the basic unit was the individual, the basic instinct self-interest, and the basic activity struggle. Spengler, describing the Origin as “the application of economics to biology”, said that it reeked of the atmosphere of the English factory … natural selection arose … in England because it was a perfect expression of Victorian “greed-philosophy”, of the capitalist ethic and Manchester economics.’
Milner noted that applying social Darwinism to the capitalism that was common among American businessmen elevated the
‘… traditional virtues of self-reliance, thrift and industry to the level of “natural law”. Based more on the writings of Herbert Spencer than of Charles Darwin, its proponents urged laissez-faire economic policies to weed out the unfit, inefficient and incompetent. "
Not only interesting in its own right, but, Himmelfarb's suggestion that ideas that are taken be some today (for example, the SADists) as being 'scientific' have their founations in the accidents of culture!
So what gospel hope can the SADists bring to a world full of suffering, when the social suffering (about a million a year were affected by industrial accidents in the 19th C in the US) is woven into reality, and not a fall from what was created as truly good? They have melded evil with good and so have no real voice when it comes to standing for the gospel against materialism, because, from the outset, they agree that materialism truly explains the world as it is!
But it doesn't, of course. Materialism's posturing grinds to a halt when confronted by the history of destruction over the earth (the flood) and the mind-boggling complexity of life, for which it provides no explanation (posturing aside, of course).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
