Connect 09, like the 10 year mission, reminds me of the futility of 'management by slogan'.
If that's all the SAD has to offer, I think it should change its mission!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
A blog dedicated to exposing, discussing and, we pray, undoing the Anglican Diocese of Sydney's drift into heresy. "nam error circa creaturas redundat in falsam de Deo sententiam" Aquinas ...wrong thinking about creation will lead to wrong thinking about God... "I’m going to be faithful to the word of God, even though in terms of the popular culture I’m a villain..." Peter Jensen (!)
Search This Blog
Posts
Read These First!
Articles on Creation
Blogs We Watch
-
-
-
Some other blogs & sites15 years ago
-
Just up at The Best Schools blog12 years ago
-
Origins Related Sites
- Spetner: no chance!
- SAH Blog Files
- Origin Persective
- One Small Speck: contra evolution!
- On Genesis
- Language of Canaan
- Institute for Creation Research
- Genesis: A Biblical Theology
- Genesis Sources
- Creation: Australian Site
- Creation Science Movement UK
- Creation Research Society
- Creation Links
- Berlinski article
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(172)
-
▼
May
(24)
- Nest of Anti-Semites Exposed in Anglican Diocese o...
- K-D: THE CREATION OF THE WORLD Part 3
- A belated Happy 60th, Israel (part 1)
- Genesis sermons
- On Genesis and its interpretation
- Hans-Georg throws light
- Aboriginal mission and evolution
- The obstinate making the blind
- Pass Me the Cigarette Lighter Will Ya!
- Hebrews 9
- darwin dissent
- to versify or not
- K-D: THE CREATION OF THE WORLD Part 2
- Wilderness or Promised Land for Sydney Episcopalia...
- K-D: THE CREATION OF THE WORLD Part 1
- Blot saving
- Blots?
- Biblical vs Darwinian?
- Connect 09, 10, 11, 12, 13...
- Packer packs it in.
- Leupold on Genesis, from his introduction.
- The natural 'god'?
- Newtonian physicists
- The Sydney Anglican Diocese’s Quadune God
-
▼
May
(24)
Labels
- Genesis (144)
- Interpretation (104)
- Leupold (70)
- Theistic Evolution (47)
- Evolution (29)
- Evangelism (24)
- History (22)
- Atheism (20)
- Science (20)
- Creation (17)
- Jensenism (17)
- Bizzare (13)
- Moore College (13)
- Darwin (12)
- Time (12)
- SADism (9)
- Baddeley Award (8)
- Sydney Anglicans (7)
- Death (6)
- Richard Dawkins (6)
- natural theology (4)
- philosophy (4)
- Calvin (2)
- John Dickson (2)
- Adam (1)
- Barr (1)
- Broughton Knox (1)
- Cape Town Commitment (1)
4 comments:
The alternative?
1. analyse: what is the problem, or the 'gap' between current and desired state.
2. identify systemic causes of problem.
3. improve system to eliminate problem.
This is a 'day in day out' plan. No flash slogans, just keep on finding problems, and improving systems.
As I see it, the first problem is the Anglican hierarchy disempowers ministry of all believers.
The second problem is the form of services typically deprives the church of its voice: only paid professionals can speak.
The third problem is the dominance of both 'new age' and materialist thinking is underestimated and therefore ignored. So people are not engaged at their points of interest or pain.
The last point is where properly considered talk about our creator comes in.
Dear Eric,
I believe that you are right. Unless the Church follows its master, our Lord, and start with people's 'points of pain' as you say, and insists on rote recitation of 'ways to live' detached from people's lives, then it will just hear its own echo, and not the voice of disciples.
Nigel, as one who has used '2 Ways To Live' in the past I can agree with your sentiment about the weakness of tractarian evangelism.
We must remember that every person is an individual and a rigid order of delivering the gospel message will often 'miss the mark'.
It is almost as if methods such as '2 Ways To Live' are an admission that most people in the Anglican Church are not fit to share their faith and therefore need a quick fix aid.
Neil Moore
Neil, I'd agree with you. The way the Anglican church is structured, that is, to disempower most of the congregation by denying them a voice in the church, and hinging all of church life either on sacraments or sermon, either way, reserving it for 'experts' means that most church goers see the whole thing as either a spectator sport, or something they are not 'expert' enough to participate in.
Post a Comment