tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7649826198961930411.post8280790960060838720..comments2023-11-02T22:17:59.419+11:00Comments on Sydney Anglican Heretics: ChestertonErichttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04827951993182450846noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7649826198961930411.post-89426156735118488492008-11-23T11:23:00.000+11:002008-11-23T11:23:00.000+11:00Well, because the structure of SADs is entirely no...Well, because the structure of SADs is entirely non-biblical i.e. hierarchical, then one can't question, particularly from outside, error.<BR/><BR/>In any case, SADs can't have error because the fact that SAD exists is proof that God approves.Johnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17496161581317710863noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7649826198961930411.post-64586490609040685952008-11-19T22:56:00.000+11:002008-11-19T22:56:00.000+11:00The paucity of evidence for Darwinism today would ...The paucity of evidence for Darwinism today would only steel G.K. Chesterton all the more were he alive today.<BR/><BR/>Neilneil moorehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04381046852732380906noreply@blogger.com