tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7649826198961930411.post2000664359700612904..comments2023-11-02T22:17:59.419+11:00Comments on Sydney Anglican Heretics: Ebbs and FlowsErichttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04827951993182450846noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7649826198961930411.post-64497485757166537652008-12-19T01:20:00.000+11:002008-12-19T01:20:00.000+11:00Healy's criticism of the science of writers here m...Healy's criticism of the science of writers here must be his little joke. Every time in the past here when he has proferred his understanding of some scientific issue he's been hit for six. He then runs for cover and re-emergessome while later when he feels safe.<BR/><BR/>Neilneil moorehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04381046852732380906noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7649826198961930411.post-85642354957047935902008-12-16T01:52:00.000+11:002008-12-16T01:52:00.000+11:00Healy Hatman need only do a google for Discover Ma...Healy Hatman need only do a google for Discover Magazine April 2006 and look for the article headed Schweitzer's Dangerous Discovery.<BR/><BR/>Sam Druckersam druckerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10410050665216630349noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7649826198961930411.post-65909095915525800082008-12-14T16:02:00.000+11:002008-12-14T16:02:00.000+11:00Healy welcome back.I think it was you who said my ...Healy welcome back.<BR/><BR/>I think it was you who said my understanding of the implications of the Kaibab Upwarp was wrong. I remember you were going to show me where I was wrong. Maybe you or one of thhe other blogers can let me know. Maybe if occurred during my long absence in France.<BR/><BR/>Anyway welcome back H-man, and Merry Christmas.Warwickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09787597131736985239noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7649826198961930411.post-3062658567339495842008-12-14T12:02:00.000+11:002008-12-14T12:02:00.000+11:00Oh, Healy, got up on the wrong side of bed this mo...Oh, Healy, got up on the wrong side of bed this morning, did we young man? All this Xmas cheer starting to peeve you? Let me whistle you a tune..<BR/><BR/>"Noel, Noel, Noel, Noel, Born is the King of ISraeeellllll."<BR/><BR/>We're still all praying for, mate. The bus hasn't left yet.Johnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17496161581317710863noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7649826198961930411.post-50128964976435176432008-12-13T23:53:00.000+11:002008-12-13T23:53:00.000+11:00An example is that of Mary Schweitzer, Paleontolog...<I>An example is that of Mary Schweitzer, Paleontologist, who found T rex dinosaur bone only partially fossilised and containing what she observed to be Red Blood Cells, bearing soft tissue and having a cadaverous odour. Such a find fits well with a 'Six Day, Young Earth Creationist' view of Origins</I><BR/><BR/>Since when has there been a "cadaverous odour" or "soft tissue" ? Never seen those words inserted into the story anywhere but there.<BR/><BR/>And I've read some of those articles you claim aren't getting their due consideration. There's a reason they don't get in: usually the science is flawed (ignoring anything that doesn't fit with a 6kyo earth). But how could the science be anything BUT flawed? You lot don't want to promote SCIENCE... you want to destroy it and replace it with worshipping and praying and Jesus. <BR/><BR/>Just admit that it's not important to you how rigorous the science behind your creationism is, as long as it says "the Earth is 6000 years old praise Jesus"Healyhatmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00274157595700818024noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7649826198961930411.post-6936923157866873102008-12-03T20:44:00.000+11:002008-12-03T20:44:00.000+11:00Sam, it is just as you say. You can't even expect ...Sam, it is just as you say. You can't even expect peer review because having a Reformed approach to Scripture and consequent world view you are not regarded as a peer in secular circles.<BR/><BR/>I remember a story of a chap some 20 or more years ago writing to the Editor of National Geographic expressing concern over the bias toward the naturalistic evolutionary content of articles published in the magazine to the complete exclusion of a theistic alternative. The writer also threatened to cancel his subscription. <BR/><BR/>The response from the Editor was to ridicule a theistic alternative and to say that if the writer gave any credence to this view then the publication was better off not having him as a subscriber.<BR/><BR/>Neilneil moorehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04381046852732380906noreply@blogger.com