A blog dedicated to exposing, discussing and, we pray, undoing the Anglican Diocese of Sydney's drift into heresy. "nam error circa creaturas redundat in falsam de Deo sententiam" Aquinas ...wrong thinking about creation will lead to wrong thinking about God... "I’m going to be faithful to the word of God, even though in terms of the popular culture I’m a villain..." Peter Jensen (!)
A blog dedicated to exposing, discussing and, we pray, undoing the Anglican Diocese of Sydney's drift into heresy.
"nam error circa creaturas redundat in falsam de Deo sententiam"
Aquinas
...wrong thinking about creation will lead to wrong thinking about God...
"I’m going to be faithful to the word of God, even though in terms of the popular culture I’m a villain..." Peter Jensen (!)
The paucity of evidence for Darwinism today would only steel G.K. Chesterton all the more were he alive today.Neil
Well, because the structure of SADs is entirely non-biblical i.e. hierarchical, then one can't question, particularly from outside, error.In any case, SADs can't have error because the fact that SAD exists is proof that God approves.
Hi, please feel free to comment. But also, feel free to make sense!
The paucity of evidence for Darwinism today would only steel G.K. Chesterton all the more were he alive today.
ReplyDeleteNeil
Well, because the structure of SADs is entirely non-biblical i.e. hierarchical, then one can't question, particularly from outside, error.
ReplyDeleteIn any case, SADs can't have error because the fact that SAD exists is proof that God approves.